Model comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 10.7.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1319 |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1302 |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1213 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1229 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1204 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.