Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 9.9.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.