Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Nemo
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 26.5 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Nemo leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.