Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Ministral 3B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 26.5 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Ministral 3B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Ministral 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.