Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 29.1 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1101 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1100 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena French | — | 1135 |
| LMArena German | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1087 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1088 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.