Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen Turbo
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 15.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.