Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.