Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 26.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.