Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Large

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Large in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mistral Large leads 67.9 to 49.9.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Large specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index29.331.9
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1651

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Coding10341277
HumanEval+17.7%62.2%
MBPP+23.3%59.5%
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Hard Prompts10051257
SimpleBench—22.5%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Math10471262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.5%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Expert9701232
GPQA Diamond—51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
MMLU—80%

Multilingual Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Non-English9881237
LMArena Chinese10121240
LMArena German9441254
LMArena Korean8991202
LMArena Russian9901257
LMArena French—1325
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Instruction Following9921249
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%

Long Context Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query10031261

Writing & Preference Mistral Large leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITMistral Large
LMArena Text10221266
LMArena Creative Writing9981243
LMArena Multi-Turn9591260
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Large?

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mistral Large better for coding?

Mistral Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Large share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper