Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 46.7 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1292 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1245 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1272 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1234 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1264 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
Long Context Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.