Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 28.3 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.