Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Yi-34B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-34B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 26.0 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 27.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1112 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.28 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1175 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1091 |
Long Context Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Yi-34B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Yi-34B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Yi-34B better for coding?
Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Yi-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.