Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Llama 3.2 90B

Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 4 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 18.2% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Claude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index29.027.5
Released2024-02-292024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked309

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
BALROG—27.3%

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7125.5
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%2.6%
MATH Level 518.2%39.4%
LMArena Math1213—

Knowledge Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond40.6%41%
MMLU75.9%80.3%
LMArena Expert1173—

Multimodal Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision9841000
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1189—
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Llama 3.2 90B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper