Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 9.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 23.3% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1005 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1047 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 970 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 944 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 992 |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.