Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.6 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1436 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1385 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1405 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 3.5 Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.