Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 27B

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified October 12, 2026. 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 27B

Alibaba (Qwen)

42.2

Rank #117 Confirmed

Summary

They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 48.5 to 25.9.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 27B.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.6 27B specifications
	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
Provider	Google	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	41.5	42.2
Released	2026-07-21	2026-04-22
Weights	Proprietary	Open
Context window	1.05M	262K
Max output	66K	66K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.30	$0.60
Output $ / M tokens	$2.50	$3.60
Results tracked	39	11

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
SciCode	41.3%	37.3%
LMArena WebDev	1440	—
WeirdML	39%	—
LMArena Coding	1453	—
ALE-Bench	765.27	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
APEX-Agents	29.3%	—
GDP.pdf	10%	—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
CritPt	0%	0.9%
Chess Puzzles	22%	22%
Mystery Game Puzzles	19%	7%
DTBench	83.5%	78.1%
LMCA	37.6%	34.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index	145.13	146.5
ARC-AGI-2	10.3%	—
NYT Connections (extended)	60.4%	—
ARC-AGI-1	53.5%	—
LMArena Hard Prompts	1441	—

Math Qwen3.6 27B leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	26%	35.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	71.1%	91.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4	0%	—
ProofBench	13%	—
LMArena Math	1433	—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond	83.3%	85.9%
LMArena Expert	1435	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Vision	1268	—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Non-English	1427	—
LMArena Chinese	1469	—
LMArena French	1451	—
LMArena German	1454	—
LMArena Japanese	1427	—
LMArena Korean	1407	—
LMArena Russian	1443	—
LMArena Spanish	1442	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Instruction Following	1420	—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Longer Query	1435	—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Text	1435	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1420	—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1559	—
EQ-Bench 4	—	1026
LMArena Multi-Turn	1445	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.6 27B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.6 27B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.