Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Step 3.5 Flash

Muse Glimmer and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.6 to 38.8.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Muse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index41.742.3
Released2026-08-102026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14161436
LMArena WebDev1355—
SciCode44.9%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13961411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
CritPt2.6%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14171408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert13861421

Multilingual Too close to call

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13841385
LMArena Chinese14121447
LMArena Russian13901385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13751385

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13821402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text13891403
LMArena Creative Writing13391357
LMArena Multi-Turn13991405

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Muse Glimmer and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Muse Glimmer or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Step 3.5 Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper