Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 13% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 70% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1629 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 1,158 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | 59.5% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1512 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 13% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1494 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1464 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.