Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 33.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1629 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1534 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.