Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Glimmer

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 25.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 26.6% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
ProviderXiaomiMeta
Noometry Index50.341.7
Released2026-09-212026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev16291355
SciCode60.9%44.9%
LMArena Coding15341416
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
CritPt26.6%2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts15121396

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math14941417
ProofBench70%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert15431386

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14741384
LMArena Chinese15291412
LMArena Russian14801390

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14931375

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query15011382

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text14921389
LMArena Creative Writing14681339
LMArena Multi-Turn14641399

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Muse Glimmer?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper