Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.833.0
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14001081
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14071079
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14281116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14111078
LMArena Chinese14611052
LMArena German14291083
LMArena Russian14201155
LMArena French1424—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13771093

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13941097

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14161120
LMArena Creative Writing14011149
LMArena Multi-Turn14171108

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper