Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2 2b IT

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 36.5.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index40.833.1
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Coding14001112
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14071113
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Math14281135
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Expert13981096
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Non-English14111121
LMArena Chinese14611132
LMArena French14241157
LMArena German14291114
LMArena Japanese14131083
LMArena Korean13921055
LMArena Russian14201118
LMArena Spanish14211140

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following13771118

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query13941130

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Text14161156
LMArena Creative Writing14011147
LMArena Multi-Turn14171118

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper