Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Wizardlm 70b

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 62.4 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.033.0
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14791081
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14431079
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12—
ForecastBench62—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14311116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14051078
LMArena Chinese14271052
LMArena German14131083
LMArena Russian14221155
LMArena French1431—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14351093

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14551097

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14191120
LMArena Creative Writing14121149
LMArena Multi-Turn14441108
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper