Model comparison

o1 vs Wizardlm 70b

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

o1 OpenAI

40.6

Rank #140 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.8 to 34.9.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
o1Wizardlm 70b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.632.4
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked5212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

o1: 45.7 (#64), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13671081
Aider Polyglot61.7%—
WeirdML47.6%—
LiveBench Coding69.7%—
CadEval56%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+80.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1: 24.3 (#111), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons51.1%—

Reasoning o1 leads

o1: 27.5 (#103), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13721079
SimpleBench41.7%—
ARC-AGI-130.7%—
Chess Puzzles15%—
EnigmaEval5.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%—
DTBench74.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA22.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.92—
LiveBench75.7%—

Math o1 leads

o1: 34.9 (#150), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13881116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math80.3%—
MATH Level 594.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)9.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

o1: 41.5 (#101), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond76.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
SimpleQA Verified41.1%—
Confabulations11.7%—
LMArena Expert1362—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1: 33.6 (#87), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1168—
GeoBench80%—
VPCT37%—
SpatialViz-Bench41.4%—

Multilingual o1 leads

o1: 48.8 (#137), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13591078
LMArena Chinese13941052
LMArena German13371083
LMArena Russian13561155
LMArena French1343—
LMArena Japanese1346—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following o1 leads

o1: 75.0 (#82), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13681093
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context o1 leads

o1: 50.3 (#9), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13781097
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference o1 leads

o1: 55.8 (#139), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13661120
LMArena Creative Writing13471149
LMArena Multi-Turn13681108
Short-Story Creative Writing70.2%—
LiveBench Language65.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 better than Wizardlm 70b?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper