Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 57.8.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |
Long Context Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.