Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 36.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 87.9% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.145.3
Released2025-02-052026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
SciCode—45.5%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—37.6%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1466
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond65.7%87.9%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper