Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 45.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 84.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 38.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.