Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 7 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 35.2.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index45.339.2
Released2026-06-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked3212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14731316
FrontierCode10.2%—
SciCode45.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
OSWorld 2.02.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14601299
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.37—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14661304
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)34.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14671279
GPQA Diamond87.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision1279—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14451290
LMArena Chinese15101331
LMArena Russian14571324
LMArena French1473—
LMArena German1471—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1415—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14401287

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14551307

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14551321
LMArena Creative Writing14391328
LMArena Multi-Turn14601292

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper