Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 39.2 to 29.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.