Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-30B-A3B
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-30B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 41.8 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Confabulations: 18.4% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 12.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 41K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 33.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 29.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 139.63 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 8% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| DTBench | — | 69.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 22.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 47.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1394 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 70.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1396 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1404 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1363 |
Long Context Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1317 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1378 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-30B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 37.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.