Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 23.9.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 28.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 979 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.