Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3-70B

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 12.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 22.6% for Llama 3-70B.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-70B specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index39.128.8
Released2025-02-052024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1431

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1206
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06122.93
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1195
DTBench—54.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench65.1%—
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
MATH Level 583.5%22.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1218

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
GPQA Diamond65.7%40.6%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1149
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English—1142
LMArena Chinese—1114
LMArena French—1232
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Russian—1159
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1194

Long Context Llama 3-70B leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1174

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text—1221
LMArena Creative Writing—1210
LMArena Multi-Turn—1223
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper