Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 28.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1230 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 116.02 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1253 |
| DTBench | — | 50.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1239 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 23.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1273 |
| LMArena German | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1294 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1239 |
Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1273 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1271 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1255 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 4B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.