Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Yi-Lightning
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-Lightning in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.8 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 12.9% for Yi-Lightning.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 12.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1312 |
Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1300 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1286 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1320 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1278 |
Long Context Yi-Lightning leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1311 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Yi-Lightning?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Yi-Lightning share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.