Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1016 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 993 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 947 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1007 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.