Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 53.1 to 26.0.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298), Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273), Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234), Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286), Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1013 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 946 | 1311 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296), Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1305 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298), Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3 32B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.