Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
StepFunSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1316 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1299 |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1304 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1324 |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.