Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 41.5 to 29.1.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1386 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1381 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1397 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1347 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1369 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Nemotron 3 Super share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.