Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Step 3 leads 40.3 to 29.1.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Step 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.