Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 22.3.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index39.150.3
Released2025-02-052026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1431

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1495

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06154.87
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
DTBench—94.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—48.4%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1471
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond65.7%—
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1480

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1478
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1482
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1494
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper