Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 89.8% for Muse Spark.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 50.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1481 |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 152.04 |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1474 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1455 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 40.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1509 |
| LMArena French | — | 1497 |
| LMArena German | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1442 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1451 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Muse Spark?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Muse Spark better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.