Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 21.6.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index38.649.9
Released2025-02-052026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1436

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06154.32
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
DTBench—94.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1477
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond65.7%—
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1480

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English—1471
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text—1479
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LMArena Multi-Turn—1484
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper