Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.