Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mercury 2.5
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury 2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mercury 2.5?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?
Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.