Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 24.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 32.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 135.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1349 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1343 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1338 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1329 |
| LMArena French | — | 1358 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1319 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1333 |
Long Context GPT-4.1 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 44.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1344 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1300 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1354 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.1 mini?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.1 mini share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.