Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 2-7B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-7B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 51.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 28.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1002 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 98.54 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1009 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1042 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 969 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1006 |
Long Context Llama 2-7B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 999 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1029 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 2-7B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 2-7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.