Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Molmo 2 8b
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.5 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309), Molmo 2 8b: 24.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1288 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Molmo 2 8b: 29.5 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288), Molmo 2 8b: 42.8 (#186)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293), Molmo 2 8b: 67.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293), Molmo 2 8b: 49.5 (#187)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Molmo 2 8b?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.