Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 47.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.02M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.70 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1564 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1480 |
Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 20.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1465 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 42% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1470 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1470 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1267 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1439 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1444 |
Long Context Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1410 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1447 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Step 5 Preview better for coding?
Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 5 Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.