Model comparison

Kimi K2.6 vs Molmo 2 8b

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 5 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.6 leads 68.5 to 49.4.

Side by side

Kimi K2.6 and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Kimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
ProviderMoonshot AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index47.739.1
Released2026-04-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked515

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1509—
SciCode53.5%—
WeirdML55.9%—
LMArena Coding1488—
ALE-Bench1,093—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
ExploitBench18.4%—
GBAEval0.9%—
GDP.pdf12%—
Vending-Bench 26,205—

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14701287
NYT Connections (extended)87.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles26%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles18%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA37.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.05—

Math Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond90.8%—
SimpleQA Verified34.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.8%—
LMArena Expert1491—

Multimodal Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103), Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12831081
Blueprint-Bench 23.9%—
Furniture Assembly21.7%—
LMArena Document1451—

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English14461276
LMArena Chinese1521—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1450—
LMArena Japanese1443—
LMArena Korean1427—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following14511270

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1468—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14551288
LMArena Creative Writing1434—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1725—
EQ-Bench 41202—
LMArena Multi-Turn1453—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.6 better than Molmo 2 8b?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper