Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1242 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1411 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1407 |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1399 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1415 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1413 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1376 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1390 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1394 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.